Sacha Mullins, 59 – who used to work for a woman’s magazine advising readers about their finances, offering hints and tips on how to look after their money – found herself almost destitute just months after her ex- husband sold his business for £2.6 million.
But she was denied a larger share of his wealth today after judges noted that the couple had been separated for “longer than most people are married”.
The Court of Appeal heard that her ex-husband, Worcestershire-based financial guru Peter Mullins, had been paying her approximately £24,000-a-year to fund her life and bring up their children since their 1992 divorce.
After he sold his wealth management business for £2.6 million Michael Horowitz QC ruled they should sever financial ties and consolidated all of her future maintenance into a £300,000 lump sum.
She attempted to appeal against the decision of the family judge, made last year, but her bid was today rejected.
Lord Justice Patten said: "There should be a clean break – they have been divorced longer than most people are married. This couple have got to put an end to this war. They have got to get on with their lives."
He continued: "When this marriage ended, there was nothing, all of the husband's wealth was built up again post-separation ... She can't expect to enjoy the standard of living which she would have had if they had stayed married."
The court heard that, as the £300,000 is to be paid in instalments – and her maintenance stands at just 5p a year, pending arrival of the next tranche – she faces losing her Virginia Quays home, in London's Docklands.
Her barrister, Oriel Hinds, told Lord Justice Patten that, after paying off mortgage arrears, she would be left with almost nothing to live on before the money comes through next year.
Mr Hinds, who accused Mr Mullins of still not having fully disclosed what he is worth, said Judge
Horowitz had effectively asked his ex-wife to live on about £50-a-week in the meantime.
"What is she supposed to live on in these intervening months?" Mr Hinds asked the court. "The judge knew she was facing repossession proceedings, he had seen the paperwork. She is likely to lose her property and that is her home."
Mrs Mullins, who now runs a not-for-profit education through art business, and her 59-year-old ex-husband lived together for a decade, but were married for only a few years before they were divorced in 1992.
Read more on this story here.